October 29, 2005
Excerpts from a transcript of a Tribeca Film Festival panel, including the moderator Harry Evans, author of "They Made America" and Sylvia Nasar, author of "A Beautiful Mind".
HE: Did you ever imagine this story (ABM) could be a movie?
SN: When the story appeared in the Sunday business section of the NY Times I got calls from people wanting to make a movie. When I first heard the capsule of the story I thought it was a fairy tale. So, on one level of course I couldn't imagine, until Russell Crowe was cast, that anyone would make a movie about a crazy mathematician.
When my family and I saw the first directors cut, I was amazed. What was even more amazing to me, is that it made math, and people who have ideas, cool.
HE: In a sense, the hidden star of the movies we're talking about is the technology. And yet the star is the star.
Sylvia, you said a very revealing thing, I thought, at the very beginning of this discussion "oh yeah, once I knew Russell Crowe was cast." When you were writing about Nash, you weren't thinking about Russell Crowe for pete's sake?
SN: No.
HE: How close does the actor have to be to the real person? In other words, how close was Russell Crowe to Nash, who was alive? And how far is the actor so important today, whether it be Tom Cruise or Russell Crowe or Nicole Kidman or Liam Neeson? Was he Nash? In most people's minds, Nash is Russell Crowe.
SN: Yes, so much so that Ron Howard was on a panel at the NYU Film School and some professors who'd known Nash in the 50s, came up to him and said "by the way, we want you to know that John Nash really did look like Russell Crowe when he was young."
You know, when I heard that Russell Crowe was going to do it, I was so elated because, Russell Crowe completely inhabits the character - I'd only seen Insider, Gladiator & LA Confidential - you couldn't recognize him from one film to the other - but the other thing about him is that he has a fantastically high IQ, he's fantastically smart.
HE: But did he understand the mathematics?
SN: No.
SN: Ron Howard told John Nash to please not come by the movie set in Princeton because Russell Crowe was playing the young John Nash and Ron Howard thought it would be disconcerting to see the 70 something John Nash. One day John Nash appeared on the set, wearing a raincoat and carrying a briefcase, and Russell Crowe offered him some tea and they had a conversation that lasted maybe 5 minutes.
Well, Russell Crowe reproduced the whole exchange, it became a scene in the movie, and he absorbed in that very short exchange, the appearance, the clothing, the gestures, the speech and the conversation that he reproduced in the movie which was about different kinds of tea, really captured something about Nash's emotional makeup. And what it captured is, that at a moment of great emotion, that John Nash goes off into this abstract reverie, so in the movie when the old Nash is being invited into the faculty club, and the pen ceremony happens, he goes into a thing about different kinds of tea, Chinese tea, Indian tea - you know, Russell Crowe is a genius of an actor to recognize that this response captured the personality of this man.
